viernes, 31 de mayo de 2013

Pregnancy App Glow Uses Big Data to Help Couples Conceive

A new pregnancy app from a PayPal cofounder aims to use big data and machine learning to help couples get pregnant.

Max Levchin demoed Glow this week onstage at the annual All Things Digital conference in Rancho Palos Verdes, Calif.

Glow, which tracks and forecasts fertility, according to Levchin, hasn't launched publicly yet.

"It's a big data or machine-learning-driven approach, where we look at our accuracy as the consumers ... users of the app enter their information, we adjust our weights on the formula," Levchin told AllThingsD's Kara Swisher and Walt Mossberg.

Women input details about their menstrual cycle and other personal data (e.g., emotional discomfort, basal body temperature) and the app can provide a fertility window. The app's calendar can show the likelihood of pregnancy on specific days. To share in the process, women can invite their partners to connect with them on the app.

In the future, Levchin mentioned that Glow may have an open API and could integrate with hardware sensors.

An Infertility Risk Pool

Levchin is also launching a companion service for the app called Glow First.

"What I really want is to solve the ridiculous financial state of health insurance at large," Levchin told AllThingsD and, to begin, he's creating a sort of infertility insurance, since that doesn't exist today.

Glow First basically lets couples "share the risk of infertility with other couples that are going through the process of trying to start families," the site's FAQ section explains.

To participate, a couple can contribute $50 a month toward the risk pool for a 10-month duration. If the couple is successfully pregnant within those 10 months, they forfeit that money and it goes toward infertility treatment for unsuccessful couples. For those that don't get pregnant, with proof of a fertility screening at an approved facility, they can get a grant to help with their treatment. This non-profit program involves an application process.

Levchin, who is a father himself, told AllThingsD that he's going to kickstart the pool with $1 million of his own money.

How comfortable are you, couples, with sharing personal details about your pregnancy process in an app? Let us know in the comments.

Thumbnail and lead image via iStockphoto, digitalskillet. Screenshots by Mashable, courtesy of Glow/Glowing.com.

12 common mistakes to avoid for offline retailers moving into ecommerce

Retail and e-tail collide creating internal chaos for bricks and mortar retailers. The result is a non-performing channel.

Ecommerce is a long term strategic play, and must be thought of as a business channel not to be rushed.

Bricks and mortar retailers venturing into ecommerce find themselves stuck in this chaotic period characterised by poor profitable performance, marred with consumer complaints, operational inefficiency, and no proactive management.  

The entire business is reactive to the problems it creates.

Sound familiar??

This chaotic period can be unsettling for retailers, unsettling for consumers, jeopardise brand reputation, and waste money. It will continue until the right change (or changes) are made.  

This comes not as a result of competitive pressure or other external factors, but from a single or series of decision making from the top down. 

There is a right way to manage and work through the infancy of an ecommerce channel and it's the primary function of the leader within the retail organisation to prepare and navigate the business through common mistakes replicated over and over again.  

Here are the 12 most common mistakes to avoid and recommendations on how to avoid them:  

Building a solid ecommerce foundation: infrastructure

The problem

Legacy technology continues to slow the growth of ecommerce for retailers. Old technology not having the ability to effectively communicate to newer ecommerce systems and other touch points.  

The retailer is heavily reliant on the old technology for business operations and is forced to do a "work around" for the ecommerce solution.  These "work arounds" affect the integrity of content, operational efficiency, and scalability.

The solution

Retailers need to think differently about their infrastructure and how it serves the customer journey through all touch points (digital and physical), and think in terms of building a customer experience ecosystem.  

Infrastructure built with this mindset is:

...a visual representation of the relationships among the employees, partners, processes, policies, and technologies that support a customer journey. And this is where many business architects begin to connect the dots between what is happening along a customer journey and the back-end capabilities the company uses to deliver customer value. There can be many capabilities required to support a particular customer touchpoint.

The root cause of failure at a customer touchpoint may result from a design flaw in a particular business capability far removed from the actual touchpoint.  By understanding the principles behind customer experience design, IT professionals are positioned to become an extension of the customer experience team, bringing to the team a deeper understanding of the supporting business capabilities in the customer experience ecosystems, and helping to design more effective customer journeys. 

One must be pragmatic in this instance and recognise large retailers will not simply discard existing systems. An effective solution is the introduction of new technologies serving as a facilitator or "middle man" passing information between legacy technology and new ecommerce channels.  

Creating a middle layer retains the integrity of the legacy technology, and delivers a nimble infrastructure for digital channels allowing offline retailers to compete with pure plays who have digital infrastructures built from the ground up: flexible, scalable, able to deliver content to multiple touch points, manage customer data from multiple touchpoints and geared for high volume single item dispatch and returns.   

Ecommerce technology: stick to the basics 

The problem

Many retailers get this wrong. Ensuring the basics of ecommerce functions to a very high standard is the early focus. With shopping cart technology being readily available and cost effective, many retailers become caught up in launching with all the "bells and whistles" with no regard as to whether it adds value to the buying process of a target market.  

Add functionality for the right reasons. Technology is meant to enhance the buying experience not hinder it.  

Solution number one  

Fancy stuff comes later. The old "KISS" acronym is very relevant for ecommerce. If the selection of the ecommerce technology is done well, the retailer will be able to add the "bells and whistles" later.  

Everyone forgets how basic Amazon was when it first launched.

 

Solution number two  

No two ecommerce technologies are created equal. A rigorous process to define the needs of the business is necessary in order to prescribe the most suitable ecommerce technology fit.  

In terms of the high level basics, ecommerce technology needs to: 

  • Have a presentation layer with flexibility to change and adapt to the continuous improvement process, and digital marketing initiatives.
  • Have a database structure to allow for the retailer product mix.
  • Have the architecture (API's) to connect to third party systems.
  • A series of features to compliment the buying process of consumers.
  • Have a development road map focusing on future development of functionality.
  • The ecommerce technology has an 'upgrade path' ensuring the retailer is always on the most current version of core code.
  • Strong support.  

Reactive decision-making

The problem  

The act of short-term decision-making negatively affecting long-term strategy exacerbates the performance issues and extends chaotic period.  

Senior management with little or no experience in ecommerce perceives non performance as an online business model flaw, or a flaw in the strategic approach, resulting in 'knee jerk' decision-making.  

The solution

To remedy this the ecommerce manager builds a strategic plan incorporating micro stages with micro benchmarks (KPIs). Once every micro stage is completed and performance is measured against KPIs.  

If KPIs are achieved, confidence is built with the senior team. If not met the ecommerce manager must explain why and either provide adjustments in their approach, or further prove the path they are on is the right one.  

By doing this two positive things happen: 

  1. Senior management sees the ecommerce manager keeping him/herself honest by challenging their own KPIs. They are less prone to get involved.
  2. If changes to the strategic approach need to be made, the ecommerce manager makes these decisions, not senior management.  

    Senior management can and should be involved in the solution process; however, the ecommerce manager needs to drive this process because he/she understands all the moving parts and knows if a solution will damage the integrity of the overall plan.   

This top down buy-in and support is critical in the long term. To build harmony with the executive team requires a communication style they are used to.  

Monthly executive/board reports are a useful communication tool to show the incremental improvement over time and force a discipline of documenting performance for the ecommerce leader.  

It's a formal forum to document operational issues and recommendations.   

Making the wrong changes

The problem

This common mistake is an extension to the point above (reactive decision making). If everyone agrees change is required, what is to change?  

Making the wrong changes extends the chaotic period by years. Retailers have changed their ecommerce technology numerous times thinking this will solve the problem only to find they have the same problem in a different form.  

The ecommerce technology is an easy scapegoat. When sales are down, it's the fault of the "salesperson". Right? Wrong. Be careful on this judgment.

The solution

To build a business case to replatform requires many facts to be presented. To determine the true issue(s) requires a complete audit on all channel activities (including the ecommerce technology).  

If a retailer had a non performing bricks and mortar location, does it make sense to replace the storefront, the displays, the sales people, and the tills without conducting a thorough business review?   

The right partnerships

The problem

This is not necessarily partnering with vendors who perform poorly (but that is a part of it); it is more to do with finding vendors who are perfectly aligned to the needs of the retailer.  

An example is the issue of poor support delivered by ecommerce (technical) vendors. Poor support translates to changes to the site being slow and arduous, affecting any continuous improvement process, and speed to market comes to a complete grinding halt.  

The ecommerce vendor is a company full of developers and technical people, they do not have a customer support bone in their body. Are they to blame? No.  

Who conducted the vendor selection process? Was there a selection process or did a member of the senior team know someone who knew someone, who owned a development company?   

The solution

Retailers need to increase the level of accountability for the performance of all vendors who deliver support and services to the ecommerce channel.  

Non-performance comes as a result of too much trust between vendors and retailers.  

The ecommerce manager must:

  • Create and sign off on extremely tight service level agreements.
  • Protect the retailer by ensuring they are not "locked in" to a vendor for a set period of time.
  • Make sure if a certain technology is selected, other technical companies can service the technology. 
  • Develop KPIs for vendors and micro manage those vendors who under perform.
  • Be more ruthless when applying due diligence on the skills and past experiences of candidates when recruiting digital team members internally.  

The last point is another important element to this common mistake. Building the right relationships extends to the internal digital teams.  

Retailers can be very relaxed in their recruitment process for digital team members purely because they don't understand how to look for an individual with skillsets they have never seen before.

Employees are more difficult to let go than vendors. Check the experiences, speak to references, and if you are looking for specific skillsets, hire a digital agency to test the individual.  

Making the most of bricks and mortar

The problem

Many retailers create a digital channel in a silo and avoid interaction with their physical entities (can be caused by an inadequate infrastructure not allowing the interaction).  

The solution

The focus is to drive the cross pollination of consumers from digital to physical retail, and physical retail to digital through numerous initiatives. The goal is to create multichannel consumers, the most profitable consumer type.  

Retailers need to embrace showrooming and exploit it. Showrooming is a method to combat the threat of international websites that are taking market share from Australian and New Zealand retailers.  

Distribution/logistics 

The problem

Perfecting the 'last mile' is an ongoing challenge, but most retailers only address half of the problem. The half normally focused on relates to achieving the 3 R's....getting the Right product, to the Right place, at the Right time.  

The forgotten half is perfecting the fourth R, "Reverse logistics" (streamlining returns for consumers). With a bricks and mortar presence this ads simplicity to consumers and complexity for retailers. 

The solution

Perfecting logistics requires the collaboration of multiple business disciplines: 

  • Creation of policies defining engagement with consumers. 
  • SLA's and management of couriers. 
  • Inventory management.   
  • Accounting. It's one thing to efficiently receive a returned product, however, there is an entire new set of challenges in producing credits in a prompt manner.
  • Dispatch logistics.
  • Inwards logistics. 

Logistics is heavily influenced by infrastructure and the development of an ecosystem focused on the customer journey.  

Taking customer service seriously

The problem

The customer service function cannot be looked upon as a cost. Using an existing call centre function for the retailer is only acceptable if the call centre has access to customer information relating to online purchase and purchase history (this comes back to infrastructure).

The solution

Customer service needs to be considered an important part of the acquisition, retention and engagement strategies.  

This feedback loop will also be a part of the strategy to combat the threat of overseas sites, and assists in driving the continuous improvement process. The reliance on this function in the early stages of an ecommerce channel is critical.  

The customer service function:

  • Identifies content needs for the site.
  • Facilitates testimonials and user generated content.
  • Identifies performance issues of the website and/or the conduct of the ecommerce channel as a whole.
  • Indicates certain policies not in alignment with consumer needs (i.e. returns policies).

Continuous improvement

The problem

Retailers will remain stuck if feedback loops are ignored and ecommerce managers do not understand the concept of always be testing.  

The absence of an internal discipline to review data, review analytics, and closely monitor the social feedback pouring in slows growth, and stifles the organic evolution of a digital strategy.   

The solution 

Ecommerce managers have the challenge of driving and growing a constantly changing and evolving channel. It is the most dynamic business environment there is.  

The key to keeping a tight grip on growth and direction is via a continuous improvement process embracing insights and adopting the philosophy of challenging the status quo through testing. These insights are the catalyst for decision-making and strategic shifts ensuring alignment to target markets.    

Hosting infrastructure

The problem

There are two things to get right in hosting, one is to make sure the site never goes down, and two, make sure the site loads quickly regardless of traffic volumes.  The expectation of consumers is very high with respect to websites being responsive.   

The solution

The old days of picking a hosting package and guessing/assuming the traffic volumes are gone. Hosting technology has dramatically advanced over the last few years creating scalable and flexible infrastructure making costs far more manageable with greater reliability on a high standard of performance and "up" time.  

This comes back to partnering with the right technology vendor and the ecommerce leader being clear on service level agreement expectations.  

Taking 'old school retail' strategic principles and applying online

The problem

Bricks and mortar retailers cannot solely rely on the tactics that made them successful in physical retail. It does not necessarily transfer over to digital.  

The physical strengths of location, location, location, and "one stop shop" are not a value proposition for consumers who buy online. This thought process comes from the larger more arrogant retailers who feel their substantial brand equity will see them through to ecommerce success.    

The solution

Bricks and mortar retailers go through a process of reinvention in order to succeed in the ecommerce channel and in doing so develop a more effective method of communicating and selling to consumers.  

This reinvention positively affects the performance of the physical retail operations. This delivery of value from digital back to bricks and mortar is unexpected and embraced (i.e. John Lewis).  

It's at this reinvention stage the point of difference begins to grow exponentially.  

Culture

The problem 

The positional power and senior level support for the ecommerce manager will determine his/her success.

Three indicators that the culture of a retail organisation is not ready to take the ecommerce channel seriously are:

  • The ecommerce manager and the team report to Marketing.  
  • Senior management recruits an ecommerce manager who is not capable of taking on executive personalities. They become pushed into a corner and are told to speak when spoken to and react to the whims of the senior management team.   
  • The organisation appoints an internal member of the marketing team into an ecommerce leadership position.

The solution

The ecommerce manager is a change agent. To create a new business channel or fix a non-performing channel requires change. The ecommerce team needs to have influence in all elements of the retail business: pricing strategy, marketing, customer service, logistics, inventory, management, supply chain, accounting.   

In summary

if you are in the middle of a chaotic non performing period and have been desperately making changes to the business to lift performance, audit your ecommerce channel against the 12 mistakes listed above.  

If you have questions or would like more detail on any of the mistakes and/or recommendations, leave a comment below.

jueves, 30 de mayo de 2013

Google Buzz Is About to Finally Buzz Off

More than 18 months after announcing that it was shutting down Google Buzz, Google is taking the final steps in snuffing out the platform.

According to an email sent to Buzz users, as of July 17, 2013, Google will remove the posts from its public servers and archive them to users Google Drive acounts.

Google Buzz — for those of you who don't remember — was Google's first attempt at a broader social strategy. In many ways, the network can be viewed as a precursor to Google+.

It took elements from Twitter and Facebook, but was focused on existing within a special tab in Gmail. The idea was that users could share quick updates with their followers or frequent contacts from within the inbox. The service could also syndicate content from other services — a la FriendFeed — and conversations could take place around that content.

Almost from the start, Buzz was beset with questions over privacy. Its opt-in, auto-follow and subscribe nature was met with a user backlash. Just seven months after the service was launched, Google had to settle an $8.5 million class-action lawsuit with users over the potential privacy breeches in the product.

Even worse, the product just never caught on with users. The idea of having a social network feed built into the inbox wasn't a bad idea, but the service didn't offer any compelling features to draw in users.

Google would try again with social, with the launch of Google+ in June, 2011. Google+ has had much more success, with the company now boasting 190 million active users.

The email sent to Google Buzz users is reproduced below.

Buzz user,

In October 2011 we announced Google Buzz was shutting down. On or after July 17th, 2013, Google willtake the last step in the shutdown and will save a copy of your Buzz posts to your Google Drive, a service for storing files online. Google will store two (2) types of files to your Google Drive, and the newly-created files will not count against your storage limits.

  1. The first type of file will be private, only accessible to you, containing a snapshot of the Google Buzz public and private posts you authored.

  2. The second type of file will contain a copy of only your Google Buzz public posts. By default it will be viewable by anyone with the link, and may appear in search results and on your Google Profile (if you've linked to your Buzz posts). Note, any existing links to your Google Buzz content will redirect users to this file.

  3. Any comments you made on other users' posts will only be saved to those users' files and not to yours. Once the change described in this email is final, only that user will be able to change the sharing settings of those files. This means that if you have commented on another author's private post, that author could choose to make that post and its comments public. If you would like to avoid that possibility, delete all your Buzz content now.

  4. The new Google Drive files will only contain comments from users that previously enabled Google Buzz, and the files will not contain comments that were deleted prior to moving the data to your Google Drive.

Once the files are created, they will be treated the same as any other Drive file. They are yours to do with as you please. This includes downloading them, updating who can access them, or deleting them.

Before these files are created, you can view the Google Buzz posts you have authored here. If you do not want any of your Buzz posts or comments saved to Google Drive files, you can immediately delete your Google Buzz account and data.

Thank you for using Google Buzz.

Did you use Google Buzz? Let us know your thoughts in the comments.

Logo composite by Mashable

15 Digital Media Resources You May Have Missed

Memorial Day weekend has arrived in a hurry, spreading some unseasonably cold weather across the country. If you've been busy prepping for your weekend getaway plans and haven't had time to check out the news — don't worry, we've got you covered.

It has been another busy week for us at Mashable, and we rounded up the top 15 digital media resources in social media and tech for you here, including news on Microsoft's new Xbox One. So go ahead and get yourself caught up, and enjoy your holiday weekend!

  • 14 Twitter Tips and Tricks for Power Users
    Check out these tips and tricks to help you get the most out of your Twitter experience.

  • How to Sync Your Facebook Contacts to iPhone
    Did you know you can sync your Facebook friends to your iPhone contacts? Here's a quick how-to.

  • 8 Tips for Successful Business Development
    Check out these tips on successful business development for startups, including how to avoid many of the typical frustrations with business development.

  • 5 Tools to Help Plan Your Next Meeting
    Planning a meeting can be a hassle. Check out these tools to help ease your scheduling complication woes.

  • 5 DIY Office Toys for Your Next Coffee Break
    Bored at work? You're not alone. Spice up your day with our five DIY contraptions you can build using basic office supplies.

  • 20 Hot London Startups You Need to Watch
    Check out these innovative companies that call London home.

  • The 25 Best Free iPad Apps
    This list of free iPad apps will save you from endless browsing in the App Store, and they'll all prove worthy of your homescreen.

  • Facebook for Android: 10 Tips for Power Users
    The Facebook Android app's most recent iterations are packed with features, from personal settings to page management to power sharing.

  • The New Flickr: What it Means for Flickr Pro Users
    Flickr made some big changes to its service; what do they mean for Flickr Pro users?

  • 5 Mobile Marketing Tools to Reach Customers on the Go
    If you're looking to supercharge your mobile marketing strategy, check out these 5 vendors that can help.

  • The 15 Best Free iPad Games
    It can be hard to find great free iPad games, but Mashable compiled a list of the 15 best.

  • Does Your '360 Campaign' Need to Be a Perfect Circle?
    When integrated marketing doesn't cut it anymore, we do 360 campaigns — after all, what better way to cover your bases than a complete circle?

  • When to Back Off the Social Media Baby Train
    Whether you're the parent oversharer or the casual News Feed browser, these tips will make your social media experiences more pleasurable.

  • 10 Best iPhone Chargers
    Whether you're looking for a compact option, a stylish device, or even a car charger, we have found a charger to suit your needs.

  • Can This 'Bike Sherpa' Get More PTAT on Facebook?
    Robert Reimann watched the second plane hit the South Tower of the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001 and then observed as his office nearby was destroyed as the towers fell. Then he did something few Americans considered at the time: He took a bike tour across Iran.

  • Image via iStockphoto, teobraga

    Early thoughts on Penguin 2.0

    So the web spam team at Google have finally pulled their finger out and unleashed a world of hurt on link spammers with Penguin 2.0. I was in two minds when thinking about putting this post together, a) because it's too early to fully understand the impact, and b) I didn't want to regurgitate the same thing as everybody else out there.

    If you have been living on a desert island for the past two years and know nothing about Penguin, you can read up on it here and here. The main takeaways:

    1 – The new version of Penguin is more aggressive

    2 – It targets lower level pages of a site and not just the top level.

    You might want to watch this again as well:

    What I really wanted to do was go over some of the trends we are seeing, and what you can do if you are being badly affected by the updates.

    Link devaluation & website devaluation

    If you have seen your rankings diminish over time, that does not necessarily mean that the Penguin algorithm is affecting you. Matt Cutts announced 3– 4 weeks ago that they had taken action against a large network of link sellers and devalued the outgoing links accordingly.

    On-going link devaluation is very evident in the SERP's as Patrick pointed out in his post on aggressive link devaluation.

    If your rankings seem to be slipping on a weekly basis, it is likely your link profile is being devalued, there is nothing you can do about this other than to remove/disavow the low quality links and focus on building stronger links based on a natural strategy. The last 3 – 5 years of your SEO is likely wiped out, getting your rankings back will not be an easy task, you will have to start from scratch.

    Authority sites win

    No brainer really, this latest round of Penguin definitely favours what everyone in the real world would consider the authority sources on the web. Government websites, news sites and advice driven resources have all fared well from the recent update, as you would expect.

    So, you may not have been penalised, or hit by the algorithm update, however you may have lost visibility to websites with more authority.

    Penguin isn't a penalty

    Many sites were expecting to see link removal efforts when Penguin reran, however it is becoming clear that Penguin is not a penalty. There will be no magic recovery because you have removed links, this is an algorithm update, it isn't Google saying 'you've been naughty, we're going to punish you', this is Google saying 'all that stuff you did to rank, we've just killed it, start again'.

    So unless you have managed to replace all the authority your low quality links were giving you, don't expect to see your rankings come back. Unfortunately, any investment in low quality links is lost, and the only way back is to invest at a higher level in developing a solid SEO strategy.

    It could get worse

    Matt Cutts has already stated that the impact can be adjusted, and I am pretty confident that he doesn't mean 'we can make this easier on link spam'.

    The Matt Cutts comment

    This update is going nowhere, Google is not going to let you off, aggressive link devaluation and manual action against link sellers and networks will intensify. Building a ton of anchor text links is not going to help you, there is no secret formula for anchor text variation, and removing links will give you a clean sheet but won't bring you back.

    As I have said on my blog and plenty of times on Twitter, if your links are acquired for SEO value only, you are likely to be in trouble now and in the future if you persist. No more easy street.

    BY Tim Grice AT 3:11pm ON Thursday, 23 May 2013

    An influential blogger and speaker in the SEO industry; Tim is our Head of Search, leading the strategy across our Search offering for our biggest clients. Regularly quoted by the biggest resources in digital marketing, Tim has a great reputation as a thought-leader in the Search industry.

    Report: Smartphones win as the most popular social media device in Australia

    Smartphones are now the most popular device used to access social media in Australia, overtaking laptop and desktop computers for the first time ever.

    According to the 2013 Yellow Social Media Report, the number of social users accessing sites on their smartphones has grown from 53% to 67% in the past 12 months, making it now the most popular device for every age category under 50. 

    Laptop use has fallen from 69% to 64% over the past year, and use of desktop computers fell 8% from last years figures. Despite this, desktop computers still remain the main device for social media for those aged over 50.

    Moving up the ranks in terms of popularity is tablet computers, which grew strongly from 18% in 2012 to 35% this year.  

    Social media apps are also the most popular way of accessing social sites on mobile devices, with 69% of users using the dedicated mobile app, compared to 19% who use the website and 12% that use both.

    Home is where our social media heart is

    Almost 100% of Australians access social media at home, most regularly in the living room, but also in the bedroom, study and bathroom.

    Increases in the number of social media users accessing sites at work, on transport and at bars/parties has also been seen in the past year.

    In fact, 6% even use social media while on the toilet and 18% in the car, highlighting that there are few areas of our lives that social media doesn't reach.

    Not surprisingly the amount of time we spend on social media has also risen in the past 12 months. 

    According to the report, 3 out of every 5 internet users are accessing social media sites more than 5 times a day.

    And the typical Facebook user spends more than 7-hours per week on the site, which is a rise of an hour on last year's figures.

    In contrast, LinkedIn, Twitter and MySpace users tend to spend less time on the sites than they did in 2012, averaging around 9 to 10 minutes less per visit. 

    TV + social media = enjoyment

    The number of Australians using social media while watching TV has also risen in the past year, with over 4 in 10 users now networking while watching their favourite show. 

    Reality TV is the most popular genre of TV show for this, rising from 31% last year to 38% this year, but the use of social media while watching news or current affairs fell 5% from 2012.

    It is users aged between 14 and 29 that are most likely to use social media while watching TV, and users aged 65+ that are least likely to do so. 

    But what is particularly interesting is the finding that almost half of respondents reported that using social media while watching television actually increased their enjoyment of a show, with only 3% saying that it impacted on them negatively.

    What sites we using and cruising 

    Facebook continues to dominate as Australia's favourite social media site, being used by 95% of social media participants, although this is down 2% from last year.

    Somewhat surprisingly LinkedIn was the second most popular social platform, reigning in 20% of Australian social users, a rise of 4% from last year. This site was more popular with men than women (25% vs 15%) and most heavily used by those 40 - 49 years old. 

    Instagram followed as the third most popular social media site in Australia (16%) yet it is rarely used by those over the age of 39, and not at all by those over 65 years.

    Twitter (15%), Google+ (15%) and Pinterest (7%) followed as the three least popular sites.

    But despite growing figures surrounding our social media usage, some sites have fallen out of favour in Australia, in particular Twitter, which saw a huge 45% of respondent report that they had stop using the platform in the past 12 months. 

    Almost 20% stopped using Facebook, 12% withdrew from both MySpace and LinkedIn and 9% left Google+.

    [Image credit: Creative Tools]

    Acer Iconia A1 Review – Unique Features at an Affordable Price

    You know when a product category is hot. Think of the onslaught of smartphones once the big guys paved the way. Bam! Suddenly everyone – from your kid to your grandmother – had one. The category of 7-8" tablets seems to be the category of the moment. Plenty of good reasons exist too: they're easy enough to stash in a bag or hold in your hand or even tuck in a big pocket, smaller screen means smaller price which of course puts less hesitation in the mind when letting kids use and abuse it. But with such a hot category the quest becomes how to differentiate the product.

    Acer made headlines in the last year putting a new spin on the laptop/tablet debate with their Iconia W7 and A5. Need a touchscreen laptop? You've got it. Need the portability of a tablet? Flip the screen around on the W7 and lay it down or detach it from the A5 and go on your merry way. Next up for Acer? Joining that fast growing category of 7-8" tablets which we here at Coolest Gadgets got a chance to preview. Launching in the next month, the Acer Iconia A1 should successfully vault them into the midst of the small tablet race with a 8GB version expected at $169 and 16GB version at $199. Affordability will certainly be the first point that will make the A1 stand out.

    Like many other competitors, the A1 will run Android Jelly Bean 4.2 and offer a quad core processor. Jelly Bean enables the owner to create multiple users for one device – each being able to customize their tablet experience. No worries about the kids accessing your private "assets" when they want to play Candy Crush. The quad core also gave a speedy experience. The microSD slot will expand another 32GB so you can take your movies and music with you too.

    Design-wise the A1 offers a healthy 7.9" screen and .43" (11.1mm) profile. One of those points of differentiation for Acer will be the 4:3 1024×768 XGA display. Some of you may consider a non 16:9 aspect ratio a deal breaker. OK, if video is your primary purpose for a small tablet we get it. But after playing with the unit we were pleasantly surprised at the 4:3 browsing, reading and gaming experience. Of course the physical drawback is that going with a larger 4:3 screen in a 7-8" tablet means a wider unit (145.7mm) versus say the Nexus 7 (16:9 and 120mm wide). So get ready to stretch your hand out to hold the unit. Another physical features worth a mention are a mini-HDMI port so you can plug in to your big screen.And as you would expect the A1 comes with cameras on either side including 5MP, 1080p capable version on the back.

    The actual user experience definitely gives a few more points of differentiation. With our on-the-go society, instant access to your top apps becomes a necessity. Acer's Touch Wakeup function will enable direct passage to the app of your choosing from a locked screen by either double thumb touch or five finger twisting motion. Personally this would be a great feature to always have your email literally at your fingertips. Like with competing units, the navigation buttons are always present on-screen, taking up a little space but always readily available. Video screen quality was adequate, giving a decent picture and handling motion fairly well. The 170 degree viewing angle via the IPS screen was definitely a big plus. Touch responsiveness certainly wasn't that of a unit twice the price. But was competitive with other units in the price range.

    After sitting down with the Acer Iconia A1 we definitely think it can hold its own within its category…7-8" tablets at an everyday price point. Sure you won't get the speed and visual impact of a full sized iPad or GalaxyNote. But then again this is a tablet meant for the masses. For those that need a unit on-the-go and have interest in sharing the device with other users take a look at the A1 when it launches in June. It will get you the mobility the masses are seeking in a small tablet at an affordable price.