miércoles, 29 de febrero de 2012

New report examines how affiliates can achieve valid incremental sales

Posted 27 February 2012 09:57am by David Moth with 0 comments

A new report by Affiliate Window and buy.at examines how affiliate promotions can complement an advertiser's online marketing strategy to deliver incremental sales.

Affiliate Window client strategist Owen Hewitson points out that advertisers commonly question the extent to which the sales achieved through the affiliate channel are incremental.

The customer may well have bought the product anyway, for instance, or affiliates might simply be capitalising on the promotions financed by advertisers to give their own campaigns a boost.

But Hewitson suggests there should be some recognition on the part of advertisers these questions should take into consideration the reality of online shopping habits.

There is more choice online than on the high street, and shoppers tend to browse several sites in search of the best deals.

Incrementality can also be defined in several ways – as well as looking at the number of new customers, advertisers should consider whether the average order has surpassed that of other channels and the type of products that are being sold through affiliates.

The report looks at several different aspects of the affiliate channel, including behavioural retargeting, cashback offers and voucher codes.

Voucher codes are a complex area, made apparent by the sheer number different types available – they are also important for brands as a study by LinkShare found that 56% of people would buy from an unfamiliar brand if offered the right deal at the right time.

So which type of voucher should advertisers use?

Depending on the objectives of their particular campaigns, there are a number of tactics that advertisers may wish to pursue to ensure that they do not unnecessarily sacrifice their bottom line or compromise brand values in pursuit of higher sales volume."

Hewitson suggests that advertisers should avoid offering a blanket discount on all products, as it cheapens the perception of the brand.

Instead it might be better to offer a code that gives free delivery or one free product, or an exclusive code to a select few affiliate sites that refer high quality, repeat customers.

One way to deal with this is voucher tracking functionality, which identifies where a code has been used and by which affiliate – so affiliates can't get away with offering discount codes they haven't actually been given access to.

Another interesting tactic is the use of basket abandonment codes.

The report points out that as many as 87% of online shoppers abandon their baskets prior to purchase, but if the email has already been captured affiliates could entice the shopper to return with a discount code.

The report cites a case study from Red Letter Days – the site uses technology that ensures that the voucher code box at a checkout page is only shown to customers referred from an authorised affiliate site.

The inbound URL was also tagged with a 'deal ID' linked to the affiliate's own network ID that is valid for a single session.

Red Letter Days could then offer its affiliates exclusive deals unique to a single affiliate and multiple affiliates could also offer different exclusive codes on the same product.

This technology also negates the fact that some consumers may be tempted to abandon their basket and search for a voucher code if they see a box to enter a voucher code at the checkout.

The full report, 'Achieving Incremental Sales in Affiliate Marketing', can be downloaded here.

David Moth is a Reporter at Econsultancy. You can follow him on Twitter. 

martes, 28 de febrero de 2012

Q&A: RBS on Google+

Posted 27 February 2012 11:37am by Vikki Chowney with 2 comments

Following our review of H&M's Google+ page - and a compilation of some of the best G+ photos strips - several brands have approached us, keen to discuss their use of the developing platform.

To coincide with the impending relaunch of its website, we start with a brief Q&A with Royal Bank of Scotland Group's Devang Chouhan on why G+ is a priority from a search perspective.

Why did you decide to open a G+ page?

As search has evolved, we expected search engines to give more weight to social signals while ranking search results. 

When G+ launched it was expected to be deeply integrated with Google search - and this was confirmed with the arrival Search, plus your World (SPYW).

So optimising our page/site for Google search was the primary reason in creating our G+ page. 

What are the benefits? 

As mentioned search was our main reason, but G+ also opens up a new channel of communication with our customers and shareholders.

While its too early to comment on our specific plans, we might use certain G+ features like hangout to engage with our customers, shareholders or staff, and circles to share relevant content with right audience. 

We can assume that G+'s influence will continue to grow as it gets integrated more and more into Google products like Search, YouTube, Blogger etc.

Do people engage with you via the platform?  

We've just begun working with the platform and haven't really publicised our page yet - but this will change as we look to integrate G+ in our new website.

What are the most important aspects to keep in mind before creating a page, and then when it's set up? 

I know this sounds cliché but you should begin with a clear goal, what do you aim to achieve from the page and the platform and how would it benefit your customers? This holds true while creating any social media account.

Also once you create a page you need to have a dedicated team/resource who would look after that page – update it on a regular basis, engage with followers/customers and have the power or know the right people in the organisation to resolve customer problem or any issues they report.

Like all platforms, comments and mentions need to be monitored closely.

G+'s real-time aspect of the comment monitoring feed invites the possibility of businesses responding to all kinds of users within seconds.

What are the challenges? 

I think there needs to be start-up culture within organisations to try out new networks. As in, to adopt a trial-and-error approach.

I know most of the organisations prefer adopting a more 'wait and see' attitude, especially with regards to social media.

By that I don't mean an organisation needs to join every social network, but identify those that are relevant to them and their customers.

With regards to G+ I think there is a lot to be gained (and little to lose).

Do you think there's any difference in how a B2C might approach G+ than a B2B company? 

No I don't see any difference. The way I see it, even in B2B, a business is your customer but, of course, your products are different.

How do you see the future possibilities for RBS using G+? 

G+ is still quiet new and the possibilities are endless so it all depends how it shapes up.

Google are yet to make the APIs available to developers, so it will be exciting to see the applications that the developer community creates.

This Calendar Fills Itself Based on What You Like

The Spark of Genius Series highlights a unique feature of startups and is made possible by Microsoft BizSpark. If you would like to have your startup considered for inclusion, please see the details here.

NYC ShopperName: UPlanMe

Quick Pitch: UPlanMe is an online notification system that filters upcoming events and specials based on what you like into one place for your viewing pleasure.

Genius Idea: Instead of searching blogs, websites, magazines and newspapers for local events, simply unlock a category of interest — sports, music, shopping, food, nightlife and T.V. — to collect new events and local news on a customized events page.


For those of us who don't have access to human lint rollers (ahem, Sean "Diddy" Combs at this year's Oscars) or personal assistants, say hello to UPlanMe. This free product will save the social lives of busy bees.

UPlanMe is called the "Pandora of calendars" for a reason. It tailors your events calendar based on what you like on Facebook, what categories you have unlocked and prior events you've noted as interesting. If you say Bloomingdale's sales on UPlanMe are appealing to you, similar related shopping experiences at Sak's Fifth Avenue, Barney's and other high-end retailers will show up in your queue.

If your Facebook page says you "like" Jeremy Lin, it will remind you when New York Knicks' games are airing on television or when front-row tickets are available on Ticketmaster.com.

The site pulls from various APIs for events and special happenings. Sports fans will appreciate the latest game updates from ESPN, CBS Sports and other national networks. Fashionistas will hear the first word about sample sales, store openings, and beauty events in their area. There's also a television section, so people can keep up with when their favorite shows and movies air.

This is why we would suggest logging into the site with a Facebook account. It will incorporate Facebook likes and interests into the UPlanMe system to improve social suggestions.

"We like to think of the platform as a giant switchboard," UPlanMe co-founder Brian Kantor told Mashable. "Users can turn on or turn off what they are interested in to personalize event calendar. Users can then share events on Facebook and Twitter, and sync with whatever calendar client they use most."

uplanme

"A lot of brands and businesses are creating Facebook events to connect with users, but there is somewhere around 1% engagement," said Sean Barkulis, CEO and co-founder of UPlanMe.

The website will give businesses a step up by reaching online audiences that are truly interested in their brand. UPlanMe provides a free, embeddable calendar for business and brand websites, promotions on the discovery page and demographic data on existing customers to tell you what events and specials to plan next.

UPlanMe just launched a couple of weeks ago, but it already has a social media reach in the millions. It's gaining page views by working with businesses who self-promote on Facebook, Twitter and other social networks.

The New York City-based startup hopes to gain about 500,000 new users by the end of their first year. The current business model is based on revenue from music, shopping, sporting event ticket sales and website promotions of different brands and businesses.

"In general, it's really about bringing people closer and connected with brands and businesses they love," Barkulis said. "We are trying to excel beyond anything that came before us."

Image courtesy of Flickr, vonSchnauzer


Series Supported by Microsoft BizSpark

Microsoft BizSpark

The Spark of Genius Series highlights a unique feature of startups and is made possible by Microsoft BizSpark, a startup program that gives you three-year access to the latest Microsoft development tools, as well as connecting you to a nationwide network of investors and incubators. There are no upfront costs, so if your business is privately owned, less than three years old, and generates less than U.S.$1 million in annual revenue, you can sign up today.

Sequoia, Kleiner Perkins, And Obvious Put $4.5M In Sleek Social, Mobile Gifting Platform Karma

Karma, a new social, mobile gifting service from the founder of TapJoy, has raised funding from Kleiner Perkins, Sequoia Capital, The Obvious Corporation, Stephen Gillett, Felicis Ventures and other angel investors. While Karma declined to reveal the exact amount of the funding round, which was raised last summer, SEC documents reveal the startup has raised around $4.5 million. In addition to announcing its investors, Karma is also debuting its disruptive mobile, social gifting platform that could change the way people give and receive gifts.

Founded by  Lee Linden, and Ben Lewis; Karma aims to give users the option to give friends gifts on the go via iOS and Android apps. While there are a number of mobile, social gifting apps on the market, Karma's service combines intelligence, social discovery, and the easy of gift giving in a sleek app that's definitely worth a look.

Here's how it works. Once you open the app and connect via Facebook, Karma will actually sift through your news feed, birthday reminders and more data from your friends to find all the occasions that could possibly be worthy of a gift, note, or thoughtful message. Karma will get rid of all the noise and highlight those important moments in your friends' lives you might not want to miss. For example, Karma will break down occasions by birthdays, new jobs, engagements, weddings, birth announcements, condolences and more. Linden tells me the startup built a semantic analysis engine on top of Facebook to highlight the most important moments in your friends' lives.

Once you choose a friend who you'd like to give g gift to, you can choose an actual gift from a selection of goods from over 50 product companies, including Magnolia Cupcakes, 23andme, Crane & Co., Domaine Chandon, Gund, Jawbone, Kate Spade, Macmillan Publishing, Moleskin, MOMA Design, Movie Tickets.com, Netflix, Pandora, Spotify, and others. So you could send a friend a dozen cupcakes or could send someone ride to airport in an Uber or simply send them a bottle of champagne.

You then choose an animated card and message to attach to the gift, and a method of delivery of the gift notice. Because you may not know your friends' physical mailing address (or may not want to type this in your phone, Karma lets you send the notice of the gift to a friend's phone via text, post a message on Facebook, or email the notification of the gift to the friend. When the recipient accepts the gift and sees the message, he or she can specify where they would like the gift to be sent.

In terms of payment, you don't necessarily have to pay right away. In fact, Karma says that users don;t have to pay until the recipient accepts the gift and it is shipped. Once that happens, Karma will allow you to enter your credit card info via the web or mobile, which will be saved for all future purchases. You can also schedule delivery of a gift for a certain time frame as well.

On the recipient side, he or she will receive a card via email, text or Facebook and will be able to open it in an HTML5 optimized web interface. The recipient enters the address the gift should be sent to or can actually choose the exchange the gift or even donate the gift's worth to a charity. Recipients can also write a thank you note (sent via email, text or Facebook update) to the gift giver. Each product/gift comes gift wrapped as well.

As Linden and Lewis explain, they thought of the idea because they lived far from family in Michigan and felt that they missed important moments in the lives of their families. Posting on a Facebook wall or sending a text just seemed impersonal and the duo wanted to figure out a way to make gift-giving more simple and social while not sacrificing convenience.

So far, in closed beta, Karma has sent several thousand gifts already and have had positive responses from recipients and gift givers.

The company also has major talent on its side. Prior to Karma Science, Lee co-founded mobile app distribution platform Tapjoy, which was acquired by Offerpal Media. He's also worked as an associate at Kleiner Perkins, at Microsoft, and was the co-founder of Y Combinator startup ContestMachine. Other employees (20 in total) hail from Amazon, Google, Kraft, Microsoft, Nestle, OpenFeint, Palm, Skype, and TripIt.

After seeing Karma in action, it's clear that the startup and its founders are onto something big. And clearly investors agree as well. Not only is the app sleek and incredibly easy to use, but it really does seem to simplify the act of remembering those important moments in friends lives while also simplifying the gift giving process. You can tell that Linden and Lewis have been very thoughtful about how the user experience can be optimized specifically for the gift giving process (i.e. not requiring payments right away which Linden says has increased conversion rates tremendously).

There are a number of other players in the mobile gift giving space, including Wrapp, so Karma will definitely face competition. But the app's ease of use and sleek user experience should be able to create a loyal following.

Why You Can’t Dismiss Nokia’s 41-Megapixel Phone

My first reaction upon hearing about Nokia's 41-megapixel 808 Pureview was that it was an absurdity, a perfect example of the very worst of consumer electronics, and a total miss. But the more I read, the better I understood that this phone isn't just some freak of nature with a ridiculously high number attached to it. It's just the slightly awkward first steps of a serious move by Nokia to differentiate itself.

If you've only skimmed the news, there are some things you should probably know about this strange beast of a camera.

First, the 41 megapixel figure is really misrepresentative, not to say untrue. It doesn't take 41-megapixel photos in any way, shape, or form. Even in the special high-res creative mode, it "only" produces 38 megapixels. Mostly it will be taking normal-size shots, between 3 and 8 megapixels. So what the hell does this 41 megapixel figure even mean?

It means Nokia is being smart about the way cameras at this size actually work. I wrote a while back about how HD does not always mean high definition, and cameraphones were an excellent example of this. Their tiny sensors and bad lenses meant that while they may produce pictures of a certain size, the quality was sorely lacking. This was because they insisted on wringing every possible pixel out of an incredibly small sensor.

The 808?s sensor (supposedly manufactured by Toshiba) is not small. At 1/1.2?, it's four or five times the size of most cameraphone sensors, including the one in the iPhone 4S. Bigger in fact than the sensors in most point-and-shoots. Now, when you make your sensor bigger, you can either keep the same resolution but have bigger wells or photosites (which detect light and make up pixels), which usually improves sensitivity. Or you can keep the same photosite size and just put more of them on the sensor, which improves resolution. In this case Nokia has done the second thing.

But they've done it almost to an absurd amount, and they know that their lens, good as it is (and fairly fast — F/2.4 is solid, though there's lots of distortion right now), can't really resolve detail well enough that 41 megapixels would be necessary. Even on full-frame cameras that many pixels is questionable.

So instead of just bumping this one spec and expecting it to sell itself, they built a whole photo system around the idea. The 808 camera doesn't take 41-megapixel photos; it collects 41 megapixels of data and uses all that data to create a very nice photo of a much smaller size. Imagine a photo around 8000×5000 pixels that isn't particularly sharp; now shrink it down to something significantly smaller — maybe around 3000×2500 pixels (~8MP), just as an estimate. You do it intelligently, sharpening and de-aliasing and doing noise removal.

Here's a rough estimate of the sizes (DPReview lists more specs):

They're using 41 megapixels of raw material to give you 8 megapixels of product. And that 8 megapixel product is going to be significantly better than a "real" 8-megapixel image captured by a sensor a quarter the size of your pinky fingernail. Their camera really is better.

Of course, this comes with the standard caveat that independent testing must be done and what really matters is how it performs in everyday situations like dimly lit kitchens, restaurants, and out of the windows of cars. We'll try it out ourselves, and will be sure to let you know if any more photographically-inclined authorities find out anything interesting.

The other shoe

And then there's the handset itself. It's chunky, it's a weird shape, the camera sticks out the back. And it runs Symbian. Symbian! Why would Nokia do such a thing?

Because this project has been going on for five years, and five years ago the idea that Nokia and Symbian would be fighting for dear life wouldn't quite have been believed. Nokia was still king of the world, iOS was just being born, and everyone was looking forward to Limo instead of Android.

They're running it on Symbian because it was designed for Symbian, and it was too late to port the software and adapt the hardware to Windows Phone 7, which came along at the 11th hour, and at any rate the design spec for their Lumia phones would never have admitted a lens bump like the 808?s.

But they're promising to bring the whole package to WP7 — which means Microsoft just got five years of Nokia R&D for free. It also means that if these guys play their cards right (a big "if"), WP7 could be the de facto gold standard for mobile photography in a year or two. When you consider how point and shoots are giving way to camera phones, and WP7 is aiming at the exact population that loves point and shoots, the pieces start looking very complementary indeed.

Nobody will buy the 808. It's an evolutionary dead end. But the camera is a desirable trait that will be introduced to the Nokia-Microsoft hybrid soon — if either of these companies has any sense. Again, that's a big if.

But this camera has restored some of my faith in Nokia and in mobile photography, something I truly didn't expect to happen any time soon, and not by them of all.

With Second Cohort, NewMe Continues Accelerating Minority Entrepreneurship

In a tech world where just 1% of startup founders are African American, it's easy for young minority entrepreneurs to feel discouraged trying to navigate Silicon Valley. But that sense of alienation is on its way out if the digital minds behind the accelerator NewMe have their way.

With its second group of budding startups one week into the three-month program, NewMe is poised to continue making progress in its mission of broadening and demystifying the path to startup success for African American, Hispanic and female founders.

"A lot of them can't go to their parents or immediate network and say, 'Hey, I want to start this app or this website, how do I get started?'" NewMe founder and CEO Angela Benton said in an interview.

When NewMe's first group of startups finished the program's inaugural session last summer, 60% were able to secure an average of $92,000 in investment money from outside funders, Benton said. The group's journey was also documented by Soledad O'Brien in the CNN documentary Black in America: The New Promised Land: Silicon Valley.

NewMe's current class of seven founders is farther along with with their products going in than the first group was, Benton said. The group is working out of a co-working space in San Francisco and being put up communally in a house in the city. NewMe has also attracted a growing list of sponsors for the accelerator, including Google, the venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, and the social discovery site Tagged.


A Network of Opportunity


NewMe participant Amanda McClure is co-founder of the startup Kairos, which aims to leverage augmented reality technology for the day-to-day interactions of the enterprise market. She said she was attracted to NewMe both for the issue it addresses and its moment of inception.

"Women aren't really encouraged to start a business," she told Mashable. "But I think now the team is ripe because people are getting a little more irritated with working for a big company and not being able to innovate."

Fellow accelerator participant Naithan Jones of the startup AgLocal said the key to making NewMe a tool for progress is companies like his and McClure's actually getting off the ground.

"It's not just a happy-to-be-here thing," said Jones, whose company intends to create an online marketplace for restaurants and consumers to buy locally-raised meats. "We need to create venture-backed, customer-backed companies that are successful. Then we can really impact this."

NewMe takes a small equity stake in its participating startups, but unlike many accelerators, does not itself provide them with investment capital. Benton said NewMe invests sweat equity in its startups and provides them with something more valuable than additional funding — a network of mentors and advisers.

"A founder of a new company needs that exportable network," Jones said.

If the experience of McClure, Jones and their cohort is anything like Curtiss Pope's NewMe experience, the twelve weeks will be time well spent. Pope's company, AisleFinder, essentially works as a Google Maps for supermarkets, directing shoppers to the items on their lists. Pope said NewMe opened a world of networking and feedback that would have previously taken much longer to access.

"I think having something of your own is what everyone wants," Pope said. "But to have the confidence and execution to make it happen is an important piece. A vehicle like NewMe, where you have that support, is huge."


Creating a New Cycle


Pope is now a member of the new crop's network of feedback and advice. He spent time at the group's house shortly after they arrived in San Francisco, giving honest reactions to their apps and business plans. But NewMe also strives to create a longer tail of influence than simply former participants advising current ones.

NewMe partner Wayne Sutton said he's seen a couple similar programs launch since NewMe began. And, while in the program, participants give talks and share their own experiences with younger minority students who may have tech or business dreams.

At a recent event at Tagged, NewMe's entrepreneurs enjoyed snacks and conversation with a group from a program for African American students at San Jose City College. The students go to school near the tech world's epicenter but are often a world removed, said program coordinator and professor of African American Studies Khalid White.

"To see people from NewMe who look like them and share some of the same interests merging their passion with their profession adds a real sense of relevance," White said. "It kind of put the students in the mind-set of, 'This is possible for us, we could also do these kinds of things.'"

With that kind of long-range impact, that 1% number won't last long.

Image courtesy of NewMe

40% of leading UK fashion brands run out of PPC budget before end of day

Posted 27 February 2012 11:09am by Vikki Chowney with 1 comment

To coincide with the end of London's AW12 Fashion Week, Epiphany has released a study that looks at the most visible fashion brands in the UK according to search results.

Using data from five sub-sectors of keywords (fashion, clothing, dresses, jeans and outerwear), the company examined link profiles and tracked which brand appeared in relation to 'key terms' for the industry. 

When considering PPC, it found clear evidence that fifteen of the thirty-five advertisers featured in the report were running significant campaigns that were regularly running out of budget well before the end of the day.

Epiphany operations director Andy Heaps said that as you would expect, search engine marketing is a big focus for the UK's biggest fashion brands.

Surprisingly though, very few are utilising both paid and natural search to full effect. We found multiple instances of poor PPC budget management, limited visibility in Google Shopping results and significant natural ranking opportunities amongst the leading brands. This shows that while paid and natural search command a substantial amount of marketing budget there is still a huge opportunity for additional customer acquisition through these channels." 

The table of visibility below, according to product and online, was based on the percentage of available clicks that an advertiser can expect to get, given their position. So 100% visibility (either on organic or paid search) would represent the top position in the appropriate set of the search results for every keyword, across the entire period considered in the analysis.

ASOS dominates the market from an online perspective (largely due to how active it is in link building activity – plus high levels of social visibility), while New Look tops the league for product due to its large catalogue.

However, objectives aren't always so broad. The study also reveals how specific strategies result in better performance, using Diesel's success in targeting 'jeans' specific keywords as an example - which isn't neccessarily reflected overall in the table.

The clothing retail industry is incredibly competitive, with high street stores competing side-by-side with catalogue retailers and online specialists for customers.

Nowhere is this more evident than in the search engine results – there are over 1m searches in the uk each month for clothing-related terms - and the value of a high ranking in the search results (either organic or paid) is potentially huge.

As such, the overlying conclusion from the study is opportunity, as you can see from the executive summary below:

  • The lack of brands using both paid and organic strategies to their full extent means more opportunity for brand exposure, especially since many studies show that there is little cannibalisation of traffic if a website has high ranking listings for both (aside from searches for the brand's name).
  • This also demonstrates that brands have an opportunity to integrate their thinking on both PPC and SEO. 
  • A lot can be achieved by looking at which keywords drive successful PPC campaigns and whether those keywords are integrated into a SEO strategy. 
  • Equally, there might be keywords driving a long tail SEO strategy that fashion retailers might not have thought of for PPC. 
  • Clearly, both paid and organic search have advantages and disadvantages for fashion retailers, so it's not all that surprising that different brands have opted to put most of their effort (or in some cases, all of it) into one or the other.
  • In most cases there is a real opportunity for fashion brands to increase their organic rankings for keywords appearing on page two or three of Google.
  • All of the most visible brands are actively engaged in link building activity, with even the least active still building hundreds of new links in the 3 month period that we reviewed.
  • Social signals are slowly being brought into search results; however social visibility can also have a positive impact on link acquisition. The viral nature of social sharing often means that as a brand, or one of its initiatives becomes more and more visible through social media, the chances of websites noticing (and therefore linking) also increases 
  • There are also huge opportunities for many brands to improve their Google Shopping visibility.

A full explanation for the methodology behind these rankings, and more detailed analysis of each brand's position is available here.

You can also review Econsultancy's SEO best practice guide, which contains everything you need to know about search engine optimisation, whether you work for an in-house client team, independently or for an agency.